Among the 1,800 attendees, there
was an invigorating mix of professionals, entrepreneurs, startups and the big
dogs in technology like Microsoft and Cisco.

<o:p></o:p>

The developments in biological
engineering were fascinating, if more than a little above the head of a solid
B-student in high school chemistry. Not surprisingly, it was the user and
sociological challenges of the IoT that resonated the most profoundly with me.
	<o:p></o:p>

As I have been learning and writing
about the IoT, there’s been a nagging issue on my mind that rarely gets discussed. Fact is, the
IoT is too focused on individuals. Having an environment that responds to my
preferences and mood sounds fantastic. However, I don’t live alone. So if I
prefer the house to be 70 degrees and my husband is a bit of a polar bear, who
does the Nest listen to?
	<o:p></o:p>

Consultants Anna Shaw and Morgan
Freelan’s talk at Solid, 
	<a href="http://solidcon.com/internet-of-things-2015/public/schedule/detail/40873" target="_blank">“Connecting home: Designing for the systems of the whole family,”</a> was a
thought-provoking discussion of this issue. To me, this seems like the elephant
in the “smart” room. More than 63 percent of U.S. households are comprised of
two or more people while many connected products/services largely work through
a “master operator” framework. That means one person has ultimate control of
the smart features of the house. 
	<o:p></o:p>

Sounds great, but for most of us it’s
not reality.
	<o:p></o:p>

When you add kids into the mix,
things can get even more complicated. The speakers shared a letter a mother had
written to SmartThings about her frustration with her “smart” lighting system.
Her son had discovered the joys of remotely turning out the lights on his
sister, causing a fair amount of drama. While she loved many features of the
SmartThings system, there was no way for her to set limits on certain
activities in the house without completely taking control away from the kids. As
she noted, the developers hadn’t designed with “knuckleheads like my son” in
mind.

<o:p></o:p>

Shaw and Freelan encouraged
designers to emulate women as they design connected devices. In addition to
their own needs, mothers consider the needs of the whole household. This is a
wicked problem to solve. The dynamics of a household that contains adults,
teens and younger children (along with the dog and/or a cat), with multiple
schedules, preferences and interests, makes it a bit more complicated to have
the Sonos system play your favorite music as you walk in the door. What if your
teenager is already there and he likes rap? Does Sonos play a schizophrenia-inducing
mashup?
	<o:p></o:p>

Practicality, solving real problems
and considering the family environments that many of us occupy will do a lot to
help move the IoT forward. Perhaps the IoT needs to evolve into the FIoT, with less emphasis on the I and more emphasis on the family (in its many diverse shapes and sizes). In the meantime, those of us with connected devices
will need to practice a bit of “smart” diplomacy with our loved ones.

Design

Interaction Design

Engineering

Electrical & Software Engineering

I recently attended the <a href="http://solidcon.com/internet-of-things-2015" target="_blank">O’Reilly Solid Conference</a> in San Francisco, a fascinating few days examining hardware, software and the Internet of Things (IoT).

Sector Page: IoT (text only)

Among the 1,800 attendees, there was an invigorating mix of professionals, entrepreneurs, startups and the big dogs in technology like Microsoft and Cisco.
The developments in biological engineering were fascinating, if more than a little above the head of a solid B-student in high school chemistry. Not surprisingly, it was the user and sociological challenges of the IoT that resonated the most profoundly with me.
As I have been learning and writing about the IoT, there’s been a nagging issue on my mind that rarely gets discussed. Fact is, the IoT is too focused on individuals. Having an environment that responds to my preferences and mood sounds fantastic. However, I don’t live alone. So if I prefer the house to be 70 degrees and my husband is a bit of a polar bear, who does the Nest listen to?
Consultants Anna Shaw and Morgan Freelan’s talk at Solid, <a href="http://solidcon.com/internet-of-things-2015/public/schedule/detail/40873" target="_blank">“Connecting home: Designing for the systems of the whole family,”</a> was a thought-provoking discussion of this issue. To me, this seems like the elephant in the “smart” room. More than 63 percent of U.S. households are comprised of two or more people while many connected products/services largely work through a “master operator” framework. That means one person has ultimate control of the smart features of the house.
Sounds great, but for most of us it’s not reality.

Interaction designers have spent decades figuring out the best way to build an interface from scratch. A lot of what we know translates well to smart products.

Don't Miss: 7 Interaction Design Principles for IoT Product Designers

When you add kids into the mix, things can get even more complicated. The speakers shared a letter a mother had written to SmartThings about her frustration with her “smart” lighting system. Her son had discovered the joys of remotely turning out the lights on his sister, causing a fair amount of drama. While she loved many features of the SmartThings system, there was no way for her to set limits on certain activities in the house without completely taking control away from the kids. As she noted, the developers hadn’t designed with “knuckleheads like my son” in mind.

Shaw and Freelan encouraged designers to emulate women as they design connected devices. In addition to their own needs, mothers consider the needs of the whole household.&nbsp;
This is a wicked problem to solve. The dynamics of a household that contains adults, teens and younger children (along with the dog and/or a cat), with multiple schedules, preferences and interests, makes it a bit more complicated to have the Sonos system play your favorite music as you walk in the door. What if your teenager is already there and he likes rap? Does Sonos play a schizophrenia-inducing mashup?

Delve has developed a wide range of products in the IoT category, from wearables to home automation devices to medical tools to connected appliances.

Services Page: IoT Product Design and Development

Practicality, solving real problems and considering the family environments that many of us occupy will do a lot to help move the IoT forward.&nbsp;
Perhaps the IoT needs to evolve into the FIoT, with less emphasis on the I and more emphasis on the family (in its many diverse shapes and sizes). In the meantime, those of us with connected devices will need to practice a bit of “smart” diplomacy with our loved ones.

Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.delve.com/services/iot-product-design" target="_blank">IoT Product Design & Development Services at Delve.</a>

SEO Text: IoT Products

Newsletter Signup: Digital-Physical Product Development (icon visual)

Jadon kelly Qo 2hhoq C3k unsplash

Connected devices too often rely on a "master operator" framework that ignores the wonderfully messy realities of family life.

Contact Us | General (Let's build something together)

Digital

Home

Insights

Designing a Family Internet of Things (FIoT)

Breadcrumbs

A full-service product design and strategic innovation consultancy.

Delve

Connected devices too often rely on a "master operator" framework that ignores the wonderfully messy realities of family life.

description

generator

kSwNn6qD4B-4HloWnWMUBWQNpBx2_mPi3nMqgsh6ato

google-site-verification

rely, master, operator, framework, ignores, wonderfully, messy, realities, devices, family, connected, life

keywords

https://cms.delve.com/assets/images/_1200x630_crop_center-center_82_none/jadon-kelly-Qo_2hhoqC3k-unsplash.jpg?mtime=1702581353

https://linkedin.com/company/delvedesign/

https://www.delve.com/insights/designing-an-internet-of-things-for-families

referrer

robots

twitter:card

twitter:creator

twitter:description

https://cms.delve.com/assets/images/_800x418_crop_center-center_82_none/jadon-kelly-Qo_2hhoqC3k-unsplash.jpg?mtime=1702581353

twitter:image

twitter:image:alt

twitter:image:height

twitter:image:width

twitter:site

twitter:title

{"title":{"title":"Designing a Family Internet of Things (FIoT) | Delve"}}

Get Inspired

Privacy Policy

FCOI Policy

Services

Case Studies

Testimonials

What We Do

About Us

Our People

Join Our Team

Careers

Newsroom

Who We Are

Boston

Madison

Philadelphia

San Francisco

Our Studios

Partner with Delve

Contact Us

Contact

Vamsee Pamula, Founder &amp; President, Baebies

Read informative articles from Delve's team of experts. Discover innovative strategies and insights about product design, engineering, and development.

Delve Insights: Product Innovation & Development Blog

innovation, product, design, advice, development

https://cms.delve.com/assets/images/_1200x630_crop_center-center_82_none/Delve_titlecard.png?mtime=1654035558

https://cms.delve.com/assets/images/_800x418_crop_center-center_82_none/Delve_titlecard.png?mtime=1654035558

Designing a Family Internet of Things (FIoT)

Designing a Family Internet of Things (FIoT)

Related Insights